I wrote a brief article about the lack of crime news coverage for The San Francisco Chronicle, which, of course, wasn’t published:
Does San Francisco care more about pets than human life? Don’t get me wrong, I have nothing against the little four-legged fur balls that perform fetching tricks and even accessorize designer handbags. But when a fatal shooting of a 21-year-old man occurred two blocks from my front door in the Mission District on March 24th, I expected the news to cover the murder and the larger crime problem. I wanted to learn why violence exists and how it can be stopped, not about the bladder bugaboos of Dinky the dog.
During my frantic internet search to find out if there were any survivors, I discovered two local television websites actually have a news category heading for “Pets,” yet none for “Crime.” Crime stories were under “Local News,” but none were recent or relevant. The San Francisco Chronicle, the only media source that mentioned it (though it can no longer be found online) posted a brief story about the shooting almost two days after the tragedy.
The San Francisco Police Department, who arrived at the scene within minutes, is often the best source of information. Each day, crime reports are added to a detailed map of the city. During my three years living in the Mission, I can attest the police department is certainly on top of things and doesn’t neglect the prevalent violence assailing our great city the way the media seems to. And this is coming from an activist. In the past there have been barricades separating the police and I.
While violent crime in San Francisco declined during much of the 1990s, the homicide rate was at its highest last year, according to an article printed last February in The New York Times. This rise in homicide should call for more crime coverage.
The Chronicle reports on crime the most when it overlaps with politics, an all too common phenomenon. But each and every murder—in every neighborhood—should get some attention too. At the very least this would put the political controversies in a context with which everyone can relate.
Most people are familiar with the Broken Window theory, coined by George L. Kelling and James Q. Wilson in an article they wrote together for The Atlantic Monthly in 1982. The theory suggests vandals are more likely to trash a place if vandalism or other destruction already exists. If the broken windows are repaired and the graffiti painted over then they’re less likely to damage the place. Like all theories, Broken Window isn’t without debate. However, it would be worthwhile for the city to apply the theory to violent crime.
If the media reports each death, and no life is without acknowledgement, then maybe the violence would decrease—or at least stabilize. News should show what’s going on in a city and it should focus on topics that interest the public. I don’t believe that the public is indifferent to violence, but right now that’s the impression the news reflects.
A story’s existence in print or on television validates that the experience really happened. To ignore the untimely and unjust deaths contributes to the greater problem of the violence. Moliere once wrote, “It is not only for what we do that we are held responsible, but also for what we do not do.”
Aside from doing their job: reporting the news, the media should put the Broken Window theory in action by taking the time to record each and every homicide. What do we have to lose besides a few less stories on pet grooming?