Writing the Other
This weekend I participated in a very inspiring playwriting workshop called, “Writing the Other.” The class was taught by Betty Shamieh at Magic Theatre. She is a world-renowned writer born to Palestinian parents in San Francisco. This three-day workshop was offered for free as part of her residence at Magic Theatre as an NEA/TCG playwriting fellow.
On the first day, she told us, “What we’re going to write about in the next three days are the things that people die for.”
Identity is at the core of each person’s outlook and at the root of beliefs by which people make every decision. Identity is personal and also tied to community or other groups that share a similar concept of self. Betty Shamieh guided us through many writing exercises where we explored our own concepts of identity and our perceptions of how others not in those groups perceive us - and from a complex and sympathetic angle.
I have always been intrigued with the arguments about what a writer has a right to portray. For instance, when Kate Braverman, a writer I very much admire, visited our MFA writing program at New College in 2005, some of my classmates expressed their feelings of outrage at Braverman’s portrayal of Frida Kahlo in her novel The Incantation of Frida K.. It was an imaginary or fictional portrayal, but the outrage was directed at the idea of a white woman writing from the perspective of someone who wasn’t. This remains a controversial issue within literary circles.
Who has the right to write from any perspective? And who makes this decision?
This weekend I gathered from Betty Shamieh’s thought-provoking course that it’s the writer who makes this decision. The point of the writing exercises was to free ourselves from these conventions, to lose the inhibitions that lock us into writing from the same old perspectives.
Today, our third and last day of class, Betty Shamieh said, “We can’t really control how the world perceives us, but we can choose how we identify with ourselves.”
If you haven’t had the honor of seeing her play, Territories at Magic Theatre, I strongly recommend you book tickets immediately. It is one of the best plays I have seen in San Francisco since I moved here four years ago. It’s nothing less than brilliant.
Territories is a historic thriller set during the Crusades. A French knight captures the sister (whose name was never recorded in any historical document) of sultan Saladdin. The experimental form was inspired by Cubist paintings and the story seamlessly explores the collision of two cultures and questions the place of women during war.
4 comments »
Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post or for TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
This is such an intriguing question Cassie. Why do we give race such a great place in terms of category? Doesn’t a male writer have to write female characters? Or vice versa? Aren’t wealthy writers writing characters who are impoverished? It would seem logical to me that race would also fall into this discussion. The same writer who can create entire worlds in science fiction should have the ability to write inside of someone’s head no matter what their race, religion, or planetary status. Isn’t the art of writing really about the interpretation and creation of an other?
Sorry for the ramble. It is a bit late here. But, the idea really resonated with me.
Comment by Kevin — January 28, 2008 @ 3:16 pm
Lovely post, Cassie. Sounds like an inspiring three days. I love the thought that the writer ought to decide the voice(s) in which she wants to speak. It motivates me to start writing something fictional. One of these days.
Comment by Jenny — January 28, 2008 @ 6:50 pm
I agree, Kevin. Absolutely. Writing should be about creating and interpreting, not just perpetuating the same old ideas. And we do see writers writing the other in all of the areas you mentioned. The human experience is complex and universal and how could this be explored if we impose rules which only serve to censor? It’s great to hear from you both. Thank you. Jenny, I hope you do write something fictional one of these days - and that you let me read it.
Comment by Anonymous — January 28, 2008 @ 8:30 pm
I couldn’t have said it better Cassie. I really cannot agree with the “essentialist” argument that you have to be of a certain race, gender, religion, etc. to be able to write about that experience. To truly be human, we must put ourselves in the position of others and understand them from the “inside” and not as the “other.”
Comment by Kevin — February 5, 2008 @ 5:35 am